The latest redistricting news from The Texas Tribune.
In a ruling on political redistricting this week, the U.S. Supreme Court made an argument for equal representation from legislators even if that means voters don't get an equal say in electing them. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/2016/04/04/TRIBUNE_EVENWEL_ABBOTT_010.jpg)
In a unanimous decision released Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled to uphold Texas' current system for drawing legislative districts so that they are roughly equal in population. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/2015/12/03/Supreme-Redistricting.jpg)
U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz belongs to an elite club of lawyers who have repeatedly argued before the U.S. Supreme Court. A closer look at the nine times the Texan argued before the justices shows wins and losses as he challenged legal limits. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/2016/01/22/Cruz-SupremeCourt.jpg)
Some people think it’s unfair to have more eligible voters in one legislative district than in another. But the number of eligible voters in each district is far from the only difference that might matter to voters. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/Redistrict_by_Students_1.jpg)
When political districts are based on population, each official represents the same number of people. If the lines were based instead on voting-age populations, their districts could have large variations in the numbers of people — voters plus nonvoters — they represent and serve. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/Redistricting_Map_Tweasers_jpg_800x1000_q100_1.jpg)
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday over a Texas case that sought to clarify what “one person, one vote” means in American politics. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/2015/12/08/TRIBUNE_EVENWEL_ABBOTT_001_web.jpg)
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Tuesday over how Americans are sorted into state legislative districts. A ruling could change the makeup of statehouses and, because state legislators draw the political maps, of Congress. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/files/bc776afab188e0951a0a988d7dc03b02/.DONTUSE%20SCOTUS)
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Tuesday in a case that could have far-reaching implications for the way legislative districts in Texas — and across the country — are drawn. Full Story
Texas lawmakers have designed a congressional district too slippery for either political party to control, making it impossible for anyone to stay in office long enough to build up the clout needed to get things done for the folks at home. Full Story
The state’s 2016 elections for Congress and the Texas House can proceed under the current political maps, a three-judge federal panel in San Antonio said late Friday. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/RedistrictCourt4.jpg)
Federal judges are deciding two major Texas election law cases. One in particular — over the political maps for state House and congressional districts — has officials thinking about 2012, when the courts delayed the primary elections. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/Redistricting-Countdown.jpg)
Not all of the pieces are in place as the new political season begins. For starters, the maps used to elect people to the Texas House and to the state's congressional delegation are still tangled up in federal litigation. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/RedistrictingEraser.jpg)
The U.S. Supreme Court says it is constitutional to let nonlegislators draw the political maps from which legislators are elected. But that doesn't mean it's going to happen in Texas. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/2014/11/07/Donna-Howard.jpg)
A Texas case accepted by the U.S. Supreme Court could decide just who a "person" is when voting rights are concerned. The phrase in question is a famous one: "One person, one vote." Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/HandsOnRedistricting.jpg)
If the Texas Legislature has to come back for special sessions after its current session ends, it might not be because state lawmakers left something unresolved. It might trace back to election lawsuits pending in federal courts. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/2014/04/29/Redistricting-Capitol_1.jpg)
A week from Monday, lawyers, reporters and other interested parties will herd into a now-familiar federal courthouse in San Antonio as the next phase of the redistricting fight begins. Full Story
Political mapmakers have moved most of the real competition for congressional and legislative races in Texas to the March primaries. The November general elections will feature only a dozen or so real contests on the ballot. Full Story
They haven’t even won their respective primaries yet, but the leading candidates for Texas governor — Republican Greg Abbott and Democrat Wendy Davis — are engaged in a bitter fight in federal court. It’s not over who should be governor. It’s about money — and bragging rights. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/2013/10/24/Abbott_Wendy.jpg)
Texas Republicans and Democrats are still at odds over voter ID and redistricting, but the venue has changed and now it's the Republicans on defense. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/RedistrictingAgain.jpg)
The state’s 2014 primaries will be held using the congressional and legislative maps approved this summer by lawmakers during a special session, a federal panel of judges in San Antonio ruled Friday. Full Story
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/images/RedistrictShapes5.jpg)